PPF vs ELSS vs NPS
Which 80C investment is best for you? A plain-English comparison with numbers.
| Feature | PPF | ELSS | NPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | 7.1% (guaranteed) | 10-15% (market-linked) | 8-12% (market-linked) |
| Lock-in | 15 years | 3 years | Till age 60 |
| Tax deduction | 80C – Rs1.5L | 80C – Rs1.5L | 80C + 80CCD(1B) Rs50k extra |
| Tax on maturity | Fully tax-free | LTCG 12.5% above Rs1L | 60% tax-free, 40% annuity taxable |
| Risk | Zero | High | Medium |
| Liquidity | Partial after 6 yrs | After 3 years | Very restricted |
| Best for | Conservative investors | Long-term wealth creation | Retirement + extra tax saving |
✅ Bottom line
For most salaried employees: ELSS first (highest post-tax returns for a 3-year lock-in), then NPS for the extra Rs50,000 deduction under 80CCD(1B), and PPF for the guaranteed, tax-free portion. Using all three together maximises tax savings while balancing risk.
When PPF wins
PPF is unbeatable when you value certainty. Government-guaranteed returns, fully tax-free maturity, and zero market risk make it ideal for money you cannot afford to lose. The 7.1% post-tax effective return beats most FDs significantly.
When ELSS wins
Over any 7+ year period, ELSS has historically delivered significantly more than PPF after tax. The 3-year lock-in is the shortest among all 80C investments. For investors under 45 with a long horizon, ELSS builds more wealth.
NPS's hidden advantage
NPS gives an additional Rs 50,000 deduction under 80CCD(1B) on top of the Rs 1.5L 80C limit. For someone in the 30% tax bracket, this saves Rs 15,600 in tax annually (including cess) — with no other investment offering this.
Run the numbers for your situation
Use our free calculators to see exactly how these options compare with your actual income and investment amount.
Go to Calculators →